[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The lists I monitor
- From: "Box, Don" <email@example.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,"Henry S. Thompson" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 10:27:51 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 6:50 AM
> To: Henry S. Thompson; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: The lists I monitor
> At 02:24 PM 5/7/01 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> >do not include http://groups.yahoo.com/group/XSDSchema. I have no
> >problem with people starting lists for their own purposes, but I
> >observe that there is already an active public list with
> open archives
> >(unlike Yahoo lists) devoted to W3C XML Schema issues, namely
> >email@example.com, archives at , send subscription requests to
> Is there a common tendency among people involved with the W3C
> to feel that
> all activity should if possible take place on W3C mailing lists?
It's not a W3C thing. It's a "it's easy to set up yet another list on
the Internet" thing. Think back a year ago or so when XML-DEV was
failing. At least once a month someone would set up a list on egroups or
wherever, yet people saw the benefits of having a single "normative"
forum rather than dozens of splinter lists to monitor.
I really doubt that Henry is acting as part of some W3C-wide plan to
stiffle discussion; rather, my guess is he is just a lone gunman acting
on his own on this one.