[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: First Order Logic and Semantic Web RE: NPR, Godel, Semantic W eb
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 14:22:33 -0500
If you must. I think we have a right to that
sort of thing but like so many rights we have,
we need to be able to afford justice. I'm
not too hip on the "load a truck with nitrates
and get their attention" solutions.
Say, tempered by the right to access and dispute.
What can you do if an entity steals your
identity? The law has to provide a reasonable
path to the resolution.
I don't think the SW gets out of control as
long as assertions can be contested. On the other
hand, that logic layer may become an obsession
for some prolog experts.
But we don't need no stinkin' illuminati. :-)
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: John Cowan [mailto:email@example.com]
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> The only truth is immediate. The only justice individual.
> Unless you can negotiate and correct the Semantic Web,
> don't build it. It becomes a Golem. If you understand
> the legend, you understand the problem and the solution.
Despotism tempered by Dynamite?