[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Types and Context
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>,Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:52:57 -0400
Len
> It probably should be a mainstream topic because
> it already is. Existence proof and all that.
right, "Infoset" and "grove" are two only slightly different angles on the
same thing. Groves scared people off and so a new word "infoset" was
invented and now its the cool thing to do.
> I am only horrified if as
> Simon and others note, options for post-XML
> processing become the definition of XML
> processors de jure.
>
right. this is something that we need to look at carefully and implement in
a reasonable fashion. that PSVI expansion of an attribute _does_ look pretty
scary :-)
-Jonathan