[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data models
- From: Uche Ogbuji <email@example.com>
- To: "Al B. Snell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:16:34 -0600 (MDT)
> OO is just language support for a common pattern, that behaviour is bound
> to bits of data, and you can substitute things for other things if they
> both support the interface required for that role.
That's the problem. I don't buy this as a definition of OO. There are
other models that are not OO that expound the same tenets. OO is just one
model that uses the above ideas, but in a somewhat limited way.
I think the argument has pretty much come down to the basis, and as
usual, the disagreement is merely one of definition.
Thanks for the ride.
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
email@example.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python