RE: ASN.1 and XML

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

No.  You'll just be as tired as the rest of us.

As for the non-well formed HTML,  that design 
was created by kids on a maillist and a network 
professional under a steampipe at CERN. 
The DTD that allowed all the badly structured stuff 
that is perfectly valid was retrofitted to a 
a tag stack.  And ya know, a tag stacker is just a prototype.

Not get results?  Millions of webhackers can't be wrong. 
That was what the Web taught us.   You mean you 
don't just LOVE N'Sync????

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Al B. Snell [mailto:alaric@alaric-snell.com]

I can imagine, especially since so much non well formed HTML was generated
in the name of SGML :-)

The use of pseudo-ASN.1 in RFCs worries me in perhaps the same way.

> If it makes you mad, good.  That's a start in the 
> right direction.

Ah, but my poor heart... I'll be on my deathbed before I'm 40, I know it
:-)