[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ASN.1 and XML
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: "Al B. Snell" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 14:28:01 -0500
No. You'll just be as tired as the rest of us.
As for the non-well formed HTML, that design
was created by kids on a maillist and a network
professional under a steampipe at CERN.
The DTD that allowed all the badly structured stuff
that is perfectly valid was retrofitted to a
a tag stack. And ya know, a tag stacker is just a prototype.
Not get results? Millions of webhackers can't be wrong.
That was what the Web taught us. You mean you
don't just LOVE N'Sync????
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Al B. Snell [mailto:email@example.com]
I can imagine, especially since so much non well formed HTML was generated
in the name of SGML :-)
The use of pseudo-ASN.1 in RFCs worries me in perhaps the same way.
> If it makes you mad, good. That's a start in the
> right direction.
Ah, but my poor heart... I'll be on my deathbed before I'm 40, I know it