Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?

[Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>]

The question[1] was not ridiculous ( at least I didn't think so... ). It was
*trying* to point out that local scoping occurs even when you don't use
unqualified elements!

My point is that local scoping gets used anyway. It's confusing *to me* when
I see two elements that *are* namespace qualified and yet have different
meaning.

Gudge

[1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200105/msg00627.html

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI" <kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com>
To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?


>
> > > Then how do you distinguish between the two title elements?
> >
> > Context.
>
> Right.I wrote this question to illustrate how the original question of
> Martin is ridiculous.
>
>
> regards,
> ----------------------
> K.Kawaguchi
> E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@yahoo.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@lists.xml.org