[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XML 1.0 is simple. was: RE: almost four years ago....
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:01:33 -0500
That's why the term "markup technologies"
was introduced to this list some years ago
and even became the name of a GCA conference
until someone noticed it didn't sell as well.
It keeps me from having to explain XML vs
SGML vs GML vs DSR.
Nodes is nodes; properties is properties.
The Groves guys had it right. :-)
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
I'm also starting to discuss "markup" as technology, and citing basic
XML rules as the most interoperable. XML has morphed into a marketing
term (and the power of raw markup, in many ways, forgotten), but the
underlying technology is still useful and worth promoting.