[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: Alaric Snell <alaric@alaric-snell.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:25:12 -0500
Out of band information.
Dealer chooses.
Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Alaric Snell [mailto:alaric@alaric-snell.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:15 AM
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: Escher could have drawn it (Re: XML Schema and Entities)
Quoting David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>:
> One
> hopes
> that the fix still facilitates significant amounts of work being done by
> stream
> transforms. CPP has done #includes as stream operations for decades,
> and I'm not sure I see why doing it in XML ought to be different.
I always that that XML including would "obviously" be a processing
instruction
issue, myself.
<?xml-include uri="http://www.foo.bar.com/fiddle.xml#...xpointer or
whatever..."
?>
- if not, then what ARE processing instructions for?
>
> - Dave
>
ABS
--
Alaric B. Snell
http://www.alaric-snell.com/ http://RFC.net/ http://www.warhead.org.uk/
Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software
------------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>
The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@lists.xml.org