[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OS other than Win
- From: Dimiter Naydenov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: xml-dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 19:35:17 +0300
Well, this is definitely not true:
> Most servers are *NIX and their stability is
> uncomparable to NT/win2k. Definitelly MS has the
> marketing power to convince the clueless like Claude
Lets not begin with the old quarrel "whose is the best". Windows as well as
*NIX has its good and its bad sides. Statements like "xxx is the
best/fastest/most stable of all OSes" have proven to cause endless (and
useless) debates. NT/2K servers are as stable as most *NIX implementations.
Which to choose depends on the particular requirements, environment,
compatibility issues, etc. And last but not least - the personal preference.