[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: participating communities (was XML Blueberry)
- From: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- To: David Carlisle <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:22:21 -0400 (EDT)
David Carlisle scripsit:
> Quite. I thought open formats like XML were supposed to save us from
> these things (or at least reduce the risk). I would never use Word for
> any document I cared to keep for exactly this reason. I don't view my
> XMl files the same way.
Sure. But there are real differences. XML Blueberry only extends the
range of well-formed documents, and it can't really add obscurity
(more than is the case from using scripts you don't have fonts for).
> > But the EBCDIC mapping table correctly maps CR to CR, LF to LF, and NEL
> > to NEL. They have distinct functions on IBM systems: it's just that
> > NEL is the plain text line ending character.
> If they really have different functions then IBM is better served by the
> status quo, where you can have CR and NEL as distinguished characters in
> XML data.
I don't say that they have different functions *in XML*.
John Cowan email@example.com
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore