[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: SAX2 ... missing features?
- From: Leigh Dodds <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>,David Brownell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:40:54 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: 11 July 2001 22:42
> To: David Brownell
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: SAX2 ... missing features?
> On the other hand, I'd love to see something along the lines of a SAX
> standard library. David Megginson's published an XMLWriter and a
> DataWriter and a fair number of SAX-based tools, but there are lots of
> possibilities which could be really useful.
[...SAX library suggestions...]
I think these are all excellent suggestions, as is the idea of adding a
library of useful tools to SAX. As Simon notes, in many cases this might
mean collating already available code under a single license. I suspect
that the others could be very quickly spec'd and written as I'm sure
we've all got bit and pieces of code that perform similar functions.
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham