RE: XML under JDK 1.0 and spacecraft

[Nicolas LEHUEN <nicolas.lehuen@ubicco.com>]

Nope, the Microsoft JVM is JDK 1.1.

I would instead suspect a Netscape 3.0 JVM. You know, "the JVM so buggy that
it nearly managed to kill Java at its birth". I'm totally off topic here,
but a lot of early critics made about Java 1.0 (slow, long startup time,
buggy, etc.) back in 1995-1996 should have been targeted to the Netscape
implementation instead.

Regards,
Nicolas

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Wayne Steele [mailto:xmlmaster@hotmail.com]
>Envoyé : mercredi 18 juillet 2001 04:52
>À : xml-dev@lists.xml.org
>Objet : Re: XML under JDK 1.0 and spacecraft
>
>
>I suspect a Microsoft JVM reason.
>
>-Wayne Steele
>
>>From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
>>To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
>>Subject: Re: XML under JDK 1.0 and spacecraft
>>Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:18:18 -0400
>>
>>[Frank Boumphrey]
>>
>> > Guidance systems are usually written in C or assembly (Speed of 
>>execution
>>is
>> > critical, so OO languages are not used), but in several 
>cases the (very)
>> > extensive documentation is written in XML.
>> >
>>
>>Yes, but there is lots of other processing going on besides guidance.
>>Anyway, I haven't heard of spacecraft use of java, I was just 
>speculating
>>about why someone might be restricted to jdk 1.0.
>>
>>Tom P
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, 
>an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis->open.org>
>
>The list 
>archives are at 
>http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
>"unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@lists.xml.org
>