[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX Filters forNamespaceProcessing)
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: Xml-Dev <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 08:22:55 -0400
On 31 Jul 2001 21:20:53 -0700, Aaron Skonnard wrote:
> On the contrary, consider the following XML schema definition and sample
> instance document:
>
> <!-- schema definition -->
> <s:schema xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
> xmlns:tns="http://example.org/foo"
> targetNamespace="http://example.org/foo"
> elementFormDefault="qualified">
> <s:element name="bar" type="s:string"/>
> <s:complexType name="fooType">
> <s:sequence>
> <s:element name="bar" type="s:string"/>
> </s:sequence>
> </s:complexType>
> <s:element name="foo" type="tns:fooType"/>
> </s:schema>
>
> <!-- instance -->
> <f:foo xmlns:f="http://example.org/foo">
> <f:bar/> <--|
> </f:foo> |
> |
> |
> Even when everything is qualified, you still can't figure out which bar
> element this is just by looking at the QName and ignoring context (is it
> the global or local qualified bar element?).
This doesn't feel like the same problem to me - it feels like a bad case
of non-deterministic content modeling. I thought XML Schema went to
great lengths to avoid that, but maybe this is legal.
Can't say it feels like a remotely good idea to me.