[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
- From: "David E. Cleary" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Peter Piatko <email@example.com>,Xml-Dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 12:48:22 -0400
> Better minds than mine can say whether my example was a valid
> schema or not.
> FWIW I seem to remember sending it and the example instance
> through XSV and
> getting an OK. (Sorry, I'm not at the right machine to check it
> right now).
I was hasty in my reply and was incorrect. We recently had a discusion about
whether you can have a local qualified element and a ref to a global element
with the same name in the same type definition, which is not legal. That led
me to jump to an incorrect conclusion about your example.
> The real issue to me is that this sort of thing is so easy to do in XML
No more easier to do than in XML and DTDs. Again, I go back to the goal of
Schema was not to support a subset of valid XML.