[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Why unqualified? (was RE: ANN: SAX Filters for NamespaceProcessing)

From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@propylon.com>
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 18:48:01 +0100


> > I'd be curious to know what counts as "a real reason".

[David Cleary]

>The serialization of objects and structures is a real reason.

Hmm. Could you give an example?

Sean

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why unqualified? (was RE: ANN: SAX Filters for NamespaceProcessing)
  - From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>

References:
- Why unqualified? (was RE: ANN: SAX Filters for Namespace Processing)
  - From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- RE: Why unqualified? (was RE: ANN: SAX Filters for NamespaceProcessing)
  - From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
Next by Date: Book that covers namespace issues?
Previous by thread: Re: Why unqualified? (was RE: ANN: SAX Filters for NamespaceProcessing)
Next by thread: Re: Why unqualified? (was RE: ANN: SAX Filters for NamespaceProcessing)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread