[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Richard Tobin <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 16:24:13 -0500
publicity rights, moral rights, and rights against unfair competition
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Richard Tobin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:19 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Subject: Re: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
>It is clear that XML does substantially use and
>modify the IP that is SGML.
What "intellectual property" (a prejudicial term if ever I heard one)
is there in SGML except the copyright in the text of the standard?
Whose is it?