[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Richard Tobin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 17:20:13 -0500
Typically, it is applied to database extraction where US law provides
"relief in discretely recognized categories of unfair competition such as
the misappropriation of the commercial value of another's identity or
persona or trade secret protection. In effect, if the proceeding could be
focused and contained to a context that would remain distinct and be
sufficiently identifiable, it would be an effective vehicle to protect that
discrete subject matter."
Part of the idea is that if a misappropriation destroys the marketability
of information (and SGML will pass the sweat of the brow tests easily as
well as demonstrate originality), then a copyright violation has occurred
despite the rewriting of the text. XML borrows enough SGML concepts
and text to make this case plausible.
Another approach would be misrepresentation in that the
original calls for participation were for "SGML On the Web"
and parties to that subsequently referred often to XML
as a version of SGML. The decision to make these references
in the end product, non-normative, were made privately.
That could be misrepresentation.
Note to Readers: we are inquiring into the value of the
statements in the W3C Specification that reference the
ISO documents and how that manifests. With those references,
it is unlikely that any of the positions taken above would
apply. Without them, XML might not pass the "laugh test"
and the W3C might well have to defend itself in court for
taking international standards and then calling itself,
a standards organization, thus becoming an ISO competitor
by misappropriation of ISO copyrighted material and
misrepresentation of intent.
Again, we are looking at the relationships among legal
entities, authority, governance, and what protections
are afforded the users of XML. Essentially, there are none,
but the W3C has protected itself by easily discernible means
in the XML documents. Whether or not it can do this AND
be a standards organization is an interesting issue.
Intergraph Public Safety
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Richard Tobin [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Subject: Re: Standards (yet again) was RE: Use of XML ?
>One avenue would be a misappropriation remedy for unfair competition
>from the seminal authority of International News Service v. Associated
>decided in 1918 by the United States Supreme Court
Once again I have no idea what you mean. Who would be competing
unfairly with whom?