[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ISO intellectual property (was Standards)
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Richard Tobin <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 12:35:58 -0500
What do you make of
"5.5 I really like the HTML 3.2 specification, but would like to make some
changes, may I modify the 3.2 specification in a few places and redistribute
it? May I call it HTML 3.2.1?
No and no."?
They are also firm about derivative works in the context of their copyright
documents, schemas, etc, and particularly concerned about XML and RDF where
are definitions (if they are non-normative, i'm not sure where that leads?).
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Richard Tobin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
There is a page about the "intellectual property" of the W3C at