[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Character �
- From: John Cowan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Fred L. Drake, Jr." <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 01:14:46 -0400 (EDT)
Fred L. Drake, Jr. scripsit:
> Looking at XML 1.0 (2e), section 2.2 ("Characters"), at the "Char"
> production, I'm led to believe that U+0000 is not a legal XML
It is not legal.
> The comment attached to that production makes things less
> clear (at least to me), in that it seems to imply that all by the
> surrogates, U+FFFE, and U+FFFF are legal.
> So, should U+0000 be interpreted as whitespace, non-whitespace, or
> an error? (References to something I've missed would be quite
John Cowan firstname.lastname@example.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore