[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Conformance Test question
- From: David Brownell <email@example.com>
- To: Gary Stephenson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:24:51 -0700
In particular, that the cut/paste was from the "2nd edition with errata"
document, which cross-references some of the changes.
Now, what I really want is a "current edition with errata", using
some publishing scheme where as errata are adopted, they're
immediately published and cross-linked as annotations ... :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <email@example.com>
To: "Gary Stephenson" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: Conformance Test question
> Gary Stephenson scripsit:
> > Hi David and Richard,
> > Excuse my ignorance, but where does the [E109] in the below come from?
> It means that this part of the text was corrected by erratum 109.
> John Cowan email@example.com