Re: Conformance Test question

[David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>]

In particular, that the cut/paste was from the "2nd edition with errata"
document, which cross-references some of the changes.

Now, what I really want is a "current edition with errata", using
some publishing scheme where as errata are adopted, they're
immediately published and cross-linked as annotations ... :)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: "Gary Stephenson" <garys@ihug.com.au>
Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: Conformance Test question


> Gary Stephenson scripsit:
> > Hi David and Richard,
> > 
> > Excuse my ignorance, but where does the [E109] in the below come from?
> 
> It means that this part of the text was corrected by erratum 109.
> 
> -- 
> John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org