[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
- From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <email@example.com>
- To: 'Richard Tobin' <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:50:48 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 2:41 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
> Back to the qualified/unqualified issue:
> ><apo:purchaseOrder xmlns:apo="http://www.example.com/PO1"
> > orderDate="1999-10-20">
> > <shipTo country="US">
> > <name>Alice Smith</name>
> > <street>123 Maple Street</street>
> > <!-- etc. -->
> >the "apo" schema is used to validate the <shipTo> element.
> >Nowhere does it say that the "shipTo" element is or should
> >be in the "apo" namespace.
> At the risk of being repetitive: the most reasonable (IMO) argument
> for this style (ie unqualified local elements) is that it parallels
> the way attributes work. Unqualified elements are scoped by the
> containing element, just like unqualified attributes. It lets you
> have structured attributes. (I don't find this argument convincing
> enough that I use unqualified child elements myself.)
The very notion that this is a style issue argues for moving it out of the
schema and into the instance. However, as I argue in another message, there
are consequences for how easy it is to distinguish local from global during
> >Applying Simon's filter will
> >put "shipTo" in the apo namespace. This behavior totally
> >flies in the face of XML+Namespaces as specified.
> Right, if you don't like the unqualified style, it converts it
> to the qualified style for you.
Right - since this is an instance transformation, let's keep this issue in
> >Also, if
> >I read schemas right, it also won't schema-validate any more.
> Naturally, you have to rewrite the schema (or validate before
> conversion). Probably this just involves adding
> elementFormDefault="qualified" to the schema element. Perhaps someone
> could write a filter to do it :-)
But if elementFormDefault were in the instance, I wouldn't need to rewrite a
schema I don't have write access to.