[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces, W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX Filters forNamespaceProcessing)
- From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@allegis.com>
- To: 'Elliotte Rusty Harold' <firstname.lastname@example.org>,Xml-Dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:42:22 -0700
> From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> And witness all the people using these products NOT. I
> classify this stuff along with tree-based XML editors and
> binary variants of XML as something that gets reinvented
> several times a month without any actual market demand.
I don't think I'd agree that there is no market demand for data-binding
tools. I think the complexity of XML Schema -- and the consequent complexity
of tools that rely upon it -- is inhibiting more widespread adoption.
> On the other hand, over the last three years as I've taught
> developers about DTDs, almost invariably the first question
> is "How do I say that an element contains an int?" and the
> second question is usually ""How do I say that an element
> contains a year since 1969?" or some variant thereof.
In other words, people want data-binding, but they want it to be simple.
And it's really not clear to me why a language intended to just support XML
validation needs to layer such concepts as types and inheritance on top of
XML -- unless it is really intended to support data-binding.