[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)
- From: "David E. Cleary" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Xml-Dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:28:19 -0400
> complexity than this). Using local types made schema design and
> maintenance much simpler than if every element name in the schema had to
> be uniquely typed. But it it also makes it harder for me to comprehend
> correctly even the relatively small (1-2Kb) messages that we typcially
> deal with.
Maybe you do not use attributes, but if you do, do you have problems
comprehending them because typically they are not in a namespace? Why are
local element types different?