RE: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProcessing)

["David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>]

> complexity than this). Using local types made schema design and
> maintenance much simpler than if every element name in the schema had to
> be uniquely typed. But it it also makes it harder for me to comprehend
> correctly even the relatively small (1-2Kb) messages that we typcially
> deal with.

Maybe you do not use attributes, but if you do, do you have problems
comprehending them because typically they are not in a namespace? Why are
local element types different?

Dave