[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:23:19 -0700
At 12:59 PM 24/08/01 -0700, Fuchs, Matthew wrote:
> In the meantime, in order to do the least
>harm to future solutions, I advocate completely excising local elements from
>the namespace mechanism by applying Andrew Layman's Wittgensteinian
>interpretation of unqualified as meaning out of the scope of the namespace
>rec. entirely.
If by "unqualified" you mean "unprefixed, and with no default
namespace in effect" then Andrew's interpretation is the only
one that is consistent with a sane reading of the namespace rec.
[And this seems to be the position adopted by XSD; does
anyone disagree?] -Tim