[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
- From: David Hunter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:59:18 -0400
For the sake of this discussion and analogy, yes, I'm treating tables like
elements, and columns like child elements. And yes, my main point is that
there is no problem telling which <name> is which, because each belongs to a
From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:44 PM
To: David Hunter; firstname.lastname@example.org
Subject: RE: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
You said it most succinctly here:
David Hunter: "There is no problem, from the database, telling which "name"
is which, because
each is in it's own table."
Isn't that the same as saying a table is an element?
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h