[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
- From: Peter Piatko <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Fuchs, Matthew" <email@example.com>,'Tim Bray' <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 22:34:19 -0400
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "'Tim Bray'" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
> Likewise, one can consider the creation of a complexType as likewise
> creating a namespace (or asserting the existence of a namespace) whose
> is the concatenation of the enclosing namespace and the local name of the
> complexType (exact syntax open to discussion) and all elements declared
> immediately within it are in that namespace.
After finally glancing at the XML Schema: Formal Description document I
noticed that NUN's (as you call them) are at least the beginnings of this
idea. Are your thoughts in the same general vicinity?