Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.

[Peter Piatko <piatko@research.telcordia.com>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>
To: "'Tim Bray'" <tbray@textuality.com>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:11 PM
Subject: RE: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.


> Likewise, one can consider the creation of a complexType as likewise
> creating a namespace (or asserting the existence of a namespace) whose
name
> is the concatenation of the enclosing namespace and the local name of the
> complexType (exact syntax open to discussion) and all elements declared
> immediately within it are in that namespace.

After finally glancing at the XML Schema: Formal Description document I
noticed that NUN's  (as you call them) are at least the beginnings of this
idea.  Are your thoughts in the same general vicinity?

Thanks,

Peter