[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: infinite depth to namespaces
- From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@commerceone.com>
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:40:14 -0700
Perhaps because there is often no single "best-practice" - I think I'd
expect you of all people to realize that. Often what is most important is
there be consistent practice - the principle of least surprise, or something
like that. Consistency is often more important than optimality.
Matthew
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@simonstl.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:59 PM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: infinite depth to namespaces
>
...
>
>
> Simple best-practice solutions are fairly easy to come up with, but
> seemingly just as easy to shoot down, suggesting that there
> may never be
> consensus on these issues.
>