[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Namespace name: better to use URN or URL?
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: David Hunter <david.hunter@mobileq.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 21:18:28 -0700
> in my philosophy, a URN provides a better fit,
In the sense that today nobody "expects" URNs to be used to
locate entities (it's a rarity) the way they do with URLs.
> (The point has also been made that it's easier to create a unique URL than a
> unique URN, but I'm not convinced that that's true.)
Well, the UUID scheme would seem to contradict that. "uuidgen.exe"
on Win32 generates UUIDs, as I recall, and the prefix "urn:uuid:" turns
one nicely into a URN ... you're safe in most cases from reusing UUIDs
that you generate like that.
- Dave