[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Namespace name: better to use URN or URL?
- From: John Evdemon <jevdemon@vitria.com>
- To: "'Hayes, Brian'" <Brian.Hayes@Commerceone.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 14:42:07 -0700
On Tuesday, September 04, 2001 4:52 PM Brian Hayes wrote:
>
> I prefer URNs since URLs tend to imply that I need to have a web
> server running that responds to the URL and can serve up the
> schemas
>
Only if someone needs to resolve them. Namespaces are just unique values.
There is no requirement (or expectation) to resolve the URI used as a
namespace value.
> Perhaps one thing to clarify is to ask what namespaces are
> primarily intended to do.
>
The purpose of XML namespaces is to distinguish between duplicate element
type and attribute names, not necessarily for pointing to additional online
resources.
The namespace itself may be identified by a URI. Any element type or
attribute name within an XML namespace can be uniquely identified by a
two-part name: the URI of its XML namespace and its local name. Anything
else is a potential extension of the rec.