[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The tragedy of the commons
- From: Miles Sabin <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:57:06 +0100
John Cowan wrote,
> Steven R. Newcomb wrote:
> > As I understand it, the "tragedy of the commons" is a concept from
> > Economics: the tendency of individuals to over-exploit publicly-
> > owned assets.
> What nobody understands who uses this example is what common land
> really was, before it was expropriated without compensation. Rights
> of common were *individual* rights;
OK, wandering off-topic, but ...
If you're objecting to Steves talk about common ownership vs.
individual rights of use (of the same thing), then you've not got a
great deal to grumble about. Arguably these individual use-rights
_constitue_ common ownership (tho' there are lots of subtleties here).
What I'd object to is the presumption of a "tendency of individuals to
over-exploit publicly-owned assets". It might very well be that
publicly owned assets are often (even typically) over-exploited, but
it's by no means clear that this is due to any tendency of
individuals. It's almost a axiom of Rational Choice Theory that
individuals are pure maximizers of an individualistically defined
utility function, and in situations with the right (or rather, wrong)
incentive structures, that inevitably leads to over-exploitation.
But RTC is just a (now rather stale) highly formal theory of
behaviour: there are no particulary compelling reasons for believing
it to be true as theory of how real individuals behave.
Miles Sabin InterX
Internet Systems Architect 27 Great West Road
+44 (0)20 8817 4030 Middx, TW8 9AS, UK