Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: [xml-dev] Has XML run its course?, Christian Nentwich
  • Re: [xml-dev] Has XML run its course?, Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [xml-dev] %x;? - Opportunity for pedantry and exegesis, Rob Lugt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] %x;? - Opportunity for pedantry and exegesis, Richard Tobin
• Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Champion, Mike
  • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Richard Tobin
    • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Jonathan Borden
      • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], John Cowan
      • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], David Brownell
      • W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policyon patents]), Don Park
      • Re: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous newpolicy on patents]), David Carlisle
      • Re: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous newpolicy on patents]), Rex Brooks
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Max Dunn
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Magick, Brian
  • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Bjoern Hoehrmann
    • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, David Brownell
  • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Fred L. Drake, Jr.
      • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Fred L. Drake, Jr.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML Guidelines, Champion, Mike
• Re: [xml-dev] schema validator, Henry S. Thompson
• [xml-dev] MSXML - Associating a different XSLT processing instruction, RArul
• [xml-dev] adding semantics to CALS tables?, DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
• [xml-dev] Xml Using VB, Pranav
  • Re: [xml-dev] Xml Using VB, MJRyan
  • Re: [xml-dev] Xml Using VB, Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Xml Using VB, Stout, Joel R
  • RE: [xml-dev] Xml Using VB, Britt, James
• [xml-dev] Calculation., Michel.LACOMBE
  • Re: [xml-dev] Calculation., Mike Moran
• [xml-dev] Re: Separating content from presentation, James Robertson
  • Re: [xml-dev] Re: Separating content from presentation, Vance Christiaanse
• Re: [xml-dev] [Zvon announcement] Character and characterreferencessearch, Miloslav Nic
• [xml-dev] [ZVON] XML Schema 2001 Reference, Jiri Jirat
• [xml-dev] W3C response on patents, Simon St.Laurent
• RE: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous n ewpolicy on patents]), Champion, Mike
  • [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, John Cowan
    • [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Simon St.Laurent
      • [xml-dev] About W3C patent policy, Murali Mani
  • RE: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous n ewpolicy on patents]), Rex Brooks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: W3C as Golden Goose (was RE: [xml-dev] [Fwd: W3C ridiculous n ewpolicy on patents]), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] OASIS TC Call For Participation: Provisioning Services, Karl F. Best
  • [xml-dev] RE: OASIS TC Call For Participation: Provisioning Services, Karl F. Best
  • [xml-dev] Reminder: OASIS TC Call For Participation: ProvisioningServices, Karl F. Best
• [xml-dev] wutka DTD parser question, Wendi Sisson
  • Re: [xml-dev] wutka DTD parser question, bob mcwhirter
    • Re: [xml-dev] wutka DTD parser question, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] wutka DTD parser question, mrossi
    • Re: [xml-dev] wutka DTD parser question, Fredrik Lindgren
      • Re: [xml-dev] wutka DTD parser question, Lauren Wood
• RE: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, David Brownell
    • Re: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Jeff Greif
      • Re: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] WWW /= W3C: Has W3C mission changed?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Check out the latest program for the XML Conference andExpositio n 2001!, Elledge, Marion
  • Re: [xml-dev] Check out the latest program for the XML Conference andExpositio n 2001!, John Cowan
• [xml-dev] Extracting GIF image in ASP?, Byron Stuart
  • Re: [xml-dev] Extracting GIF image in ASP?, Benjamin Franz
• [xml-dev] Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines, James Robertson
  • [xml-dev] Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines, Rex Brooks
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines, SHARPE, Ian
    • [xml-dev] The need for some minimal rhetorical conventions for XMLmarkup (was Re: XML Accessibility Guidelines), Rick Jelliffe
• [xml-dev] Are subelements significant by themselves?, Seairth Jacobs
  • Re: [xml-dev] Are subelements significant by themselves?, John Cowan
  • RE: [xml-dev] Are subelements significant by themselves?, Don Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Are subelements significant by themselves?, mrossi
    • Re: [xml-dev] Are subelements significant by themselves?, Seairth Jacobs
  • RE: [xml-dev] Are subelements significant by themselves?, Nicolas LEHUEN
  • Re: [xml-dev] Are subelements significant by themselves?, mrossi
• [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Seairth Jacobs
  • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Seairth Jacobs
      • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement significance", Bob Hutchison
    • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement significance", Mike Moran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Seairth Jacobs
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
    • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Seairth Jacobs
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", mrossi
    • Re: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", mrossi
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] more on "subelement signicance", Jeff Lowery
• [xml-dev] Geographic Markup Language, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] Geographic Markup Language, Betty Harvey
  • Re: [xml-dev] Geographic Markup Language, Mike Clarke
    • RE: [xml-dev] Geographic Markup Language, Juan Chu Chow
• [xml-dev] Merge to compare, Apostolos DEREKIS
• [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Dave Winer
  • RE: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Jeff Rafter
  • RE: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Don Park
      • Re: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), sateesh narahari
      • [xml-dev] Qualifying links, Julian Reschke
      • Re: [xml-dev] Qualifying links, sateesh narahari
  • RE: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] RE: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C as Golden Goose ...), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] XFORMS, Jon Ceanfaglione
  • Re: [xml-dev] XFORMS, Oleg A. Paraschenko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XFORMS, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• [REPOST] RE: [xml-dev] XFORMS, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• [xml-dev] Conversational XML, Mike Moran
  • Re: [xml-dev] Conversational XML, Robin Berjon
• RE: [xml-dev] Ambiguous Content Model, Mark Endicott
  • RE: [xml-dev] Ambiguous Content Model, Imran Rashid
  • Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguous Content Model, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [xml-dev] Ambiguous Content Model, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Message not available
      • [xml-dev] Re: Latest version of MSV, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
• [xml-dev] Software Engineer Opportunity in NYC, Larry Eisenstat
• [xml-dev] XML+JDBC=data portability (IBM tutorials), Jeffrey I Condon
• [xml-dev] Re: MSV, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
• [xml-dev] RAND issues, Tim Bray
  • Re: [xml-dev] RAND issues, David Brownell
    • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Don Park
      • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Dave Winer
    • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Don Park
  • Re: [xml-dev] RAND issues, David Orchard
    • Re: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Steve Muench
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Tim Bray
      • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Robin Cover
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Jeff Lowery
    • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Jim Ancona
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Joshua Allen
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Rex Brooks
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Jeff Lowery
    • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Jim Ancona
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Tim Bray
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] RAND issues, David Brownell
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Daniel Veillard
  • RE: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] RAND issues, Daniel Veillard
• [xml-dev] prob in picking xsd file, Hanumaiahgari, Srinivas
  • RE: [xml-dev] prob in picking xsd file, Priscilla Walmsley
  • Re: [xml-dev] prob in picking xsd file, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] When do I Create entity reference nodes, Gupta, Rajan
• [xml-dev] Schemas Vs DTDs, Amol
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Schemas Vs DTDs, Jeff Lowery
• [xml-dev] set encoding attribute, Ursprung Manfred
  • RE: [xml-dev] set encoding attribute, Julian Reschke
• [xml-dev] XML articles in ADTMAG, Robin Cover
• [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today), Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today), Don Park
  • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today), Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today), Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
    • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today), Benjamin Franz
  • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today), Richard Tobin
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, today), Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• [xml-dev] Real time XML Parser, Gordon Stewart
  • Re: [xml-dev] Real time XML Parser, Jeff Greif
• RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Benjamin Franz
    • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Ann Navarro
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Jim Ancona
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Ann Navarro
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Jim Ancona
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Don Park
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Don Park
    • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Ann Navarro
      • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), PaulT
      • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Ann Navarro
      • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), PaulT
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Don Park
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Ann Navarro
      • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Winchel 'Todd' Vincent III
      • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Rick Jelliffe
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Don Park
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Ann Navarro
      • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Don Park
      • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Daniel Veillard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] Let's get real on W3C XForms 1.0 (why it stinks, to day), Simon St.Laurent
• Re: [xml-dev] Adobe XMP?, Alan Lillich
• [xml-dev] Surprise?, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] The Long and Winding Road, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Linking documents that "belong" together == Best Practices, Adam Van Den Hoven
  • RE: [xml-dev] Linking documents that "belong" together == BestPractices, W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P.
  • Re: [xml-dev] Linking documents that "belong" together == BestPractices, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] Re: Latest version of MSV, Michael Fitzgerald
  • Re: [xml-dev] Re: Latest version of MSV, Rick Jelliffe
  • [xml-dev] CATALOGs versus RDDL, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [xml-dev] CATALOGs versus RDDL, Tim Bray
      • [xml-dev] Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [xml-dev] CATALOGs versus RDDL, Norman Walsh
  • [xml-dev] MSV and Xerces, Rick Jelliffe
    • [xml-dev] Re: MSV and Xerces, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
• [xml-dev] Thanks to HP & Oracle, Don Park
• [xml-dev] Fwd: dtd to c struct conversion, Marcus Hardt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Fwd: dtd to c struct conversion, Champion, Mike
• [xml-dev] DTD for Data Visualization ?, Dean Arnold
• [xml-dev] what's special in XMLNS attribue .?, yael efrat
  • Re: [xml-dev] what's special in XMLNS attribue .?, Robin Berjon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] what's special in XMLNS attribue .?, yael efrat
    • Re: [xml-dev] what's special in XMLNS attribue .?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: [xml-dev] what's special in XMLNS attribue .?, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] what's special in XMLNS attribue .?, Ronald Bourret
• [xml-dev] RDDL in ZIP, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: [xml-dev] RDDL in ZIP, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: [xml-dev] RDDL in ZIP, Leigh Dodds
• [xml-dev] DOM, Avital Nagar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] DOM, Williams, Timothy W.
• [xml-dev] RDDL What is it ?, Ursprung Manfred
  • Re: [xml-dev] RDDL What is it ?, Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] RDDL What is it ?, Nicolas LEHUEN
• AW: [xml-dev] RDDL What is it ?, Harbarth, Juliane
• [xml-dev] Nested DTDs, BillGong
  • Re: [xml-dev] Nested DTDs, Rob Lugt
• [xml-dev] Re: Nested DTDs, Rob Lugt
• [xml-dev] Reminder: OASIS UBL TC Call For Participation, Karl F. Best
• [xml-dev] Why RAND RF May Be A Good Idea, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Why RAND RF May Be A Good Idea, Don Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Why RAND RF May Be A Good Idea, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] [Zvon] An announcement for Python fans, Miloslav Nic
• [xml-dev] storing XML files, Albena Georgieva
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Chris Parkerson
    • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Ronald Bourret
      • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Chris Parkerson
  • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Soumitra Sengupta
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Steven Noels
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Herman van Gelderen
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Albena Georgieva
    • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Soumitra Sengupta, Ph.D.
    • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Soumitra Sengupta
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Scherpenzeel, Wim
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Chris Parkerson
      • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Tom Bradford
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Dave Simmonds
    • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, J C Theriot
    • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Soumitra Sengupta
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Dave Simmonds
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Dave Simmonds
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Jeff Lowery
    • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Ronald Bourret
• [xml-dev] good free tutorial for beginners, kaab kaoutar
  • RE: [xml-dev] good free tutorial for beginners, JR Ketelsen
• [xml-dev] white spaces, Caro, Samuel
  • Re: [xml-dev] white spaces, Marcus Carr
  • Re: [xml-dev] white spaces, David Carlisle
• [xml-dev] [OT; LONG] ISO screw specs ( was: W3C Rants (was: RE: W3C asGold en Goose ...)), Ralph Hilken
  • Re: [xml-dev] [OT; LONG] ISO screw specs, Marcus Carr
    • Re: [xml-dev] [OT; LONG] ISO screw specs, John Cowan
      • Re: [xml-dev] [OT; LONG] ISO screw specs, Pete Kirkham
• [xml-dev] cl-xml 0.915, james anderson
• [Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files], Ronald Bourret
  • Re: [Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files], Soumitra Sengupta, Ph.D.
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files], Ronald Bourret
      • [xml-dev] XML Startkabel updates, xml startkabel
• [xml-dev] schema trouble, Ian Rogers
  • Re: [xml-dev] schema trouble, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: [xml-dev] schema trouble, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: [xml-dev] schema trouble, Laura Hatcher
• Re: [xml-dev] Re: CATALOGs versus RDDL, Tony.Coates
• [xml-dev] Reminder: OASIS Topic Maps Published Subjects TC Call ForParticipation, Karl F. Best
• [xml-dev] unsubscribe, Jörg Flotho
• [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Champion, Mike
  • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bjoern Hoehrmann
    • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Ann Navarro
    • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Don Park
      • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Rick Jelliffe
  • [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Tim Bray
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Mark Baker
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Sean McGrath
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Sean McGrath
  • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Ronald Bourret
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Fuchs, Matthew
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Fuchs, Matthew
    • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Tom Bradford
      • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Don Park
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, XML Everywhere
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Fuchs, Matthew
    • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
    • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Joe English
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Fuchs, Matthew
    • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Murali Mani
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Fuchs, Matthew
  • RE: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Jonathan Robie
• RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] XML to BMS, Thomas Colin de Verdiere
• [xml-dev] Java extension, BillGong
• Is it over? RE: [xml-dev] standards vs. the public, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
• XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Champion, Mike
  • RE: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Evan Lenz
    • RE: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Chris Parkerson
    • Re: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Tom Bradford
      • Re: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Evan Lenz
      • Re: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Tom Bradford
      • Re: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Evan Lenz
      • Re: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Tom Bradford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Champion, Mike
  • RE: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Champion, Mike
    • RE: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Chris Parkerson
    • Re: XPath conformance? was RE: [xml-dev] storing XML files, Evan Lenz
• Re: [xml-dev] storing XML files], Eric Lemond
• RE: [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: Adam Bosworth on XML and W3C, Jeff Lowery
• [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Alan Kent
  • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Mark Baker
  • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Francis Norton
  • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Manoj Dhooria
  • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Bill de hOra
  • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, John F Schlesinger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Mark Baker
    • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Bill de hOra
  • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Mark Baker
  • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Britt, James
  • RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Patrick Thompson
    • Message not available
      • [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, David Lyon
    • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Ken North
  • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Ken North
    • Re: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML + Servlets}?, Mark Baker
• [xml-dev] Semantic Markup for prose, Adam Van Den Hoven
• [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, David Brownell
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Benjamin Franz
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Frank Richards
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, John Cowan
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Amy Lewis
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, John Cowan
      • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Amy Lewis
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Daniel Veillard
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bart Schuller
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Al Snell
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bart Schuller
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Francis Norton
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Frank Richards
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Joshua Allen
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jim Ancona
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Don Park
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Staffan Måhlén
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, John Cowan
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] over 50 exhibitors to date for XML Conference and Exposition2001, Elledge, Marion
• [xml-dev] Parser Performance, Hanumaiahgari, Srinivas
  • Re: [xml-dev] Parser Performance, nielspeter
• [xml-dev] Converting JScript to a Document object., Nawab Ali
• [xml-dev] XSL works only with one XML-File, Ursprung Manfred
  • Re: [xml-dev] XSL works only with one XML-File, David Carlisle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XSL works only with one XML-File, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: [xml-dev] XSL works only with one XML-File, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
  • RE: [xml-dev] XSL works only with one XML-File, DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
• AW: [xml-dev] XSL works only with one XML-File, Ursprung Manfred
  • Re: AW: [xml-dev] XSL works only with one XML-File, David Carlisle
• [xml-dev] DOMHASH and XML-Signature, April Kwong
  • [xml-dev] applying XPath to a very large document, April Kwong
    • Re: [xml-dev] applying XPath to a very large document, Dennis Sosnoski
• [xml-dev] HTML to XHTML COM component, SHARPE, Ian
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] HTML to XHTML COM component, Joshua Allen
  • RE: [xml-dev] HTML to XHTML COM component, Manos Batsis
• [xml-dev] alphaWorks updates: XML viewer, X-IT, and IBM articles, Jeffrey I Condon
• [xml-dev] parsing of xml docs / XPath, hauke.stammer
  • Re: [xml-dev] parsing of xml docs / XPath, Rob Lugt
  • Re: [xml-dev] parsing of xml docs / XPath, David Brownell
• [xml-dev] unbounded element within an <all> tag, Stefán F. Stefánsson
  • Re: [xml-dev] unbounded element within an <all> tag, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: [xml-dev] unbounded element within an <all> tag, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: [xml-dev] unbounded element within an <all> tag, Ronald Bourret
• [xml-dev] Review of RAND debate, Edd Dumbill
• Re: [xml-dev] applying XPath to a very large document, Jonathan Robie
• [xml-dev] xsd:appInfo and xsd:documentation inconsistencies, Elliotte Rusty Harold
• [xml-dev] Access the IXMLDOMNode's "attribute" property, Stephan van Ingen, thuis
  • Re: [xml-dev] Access the IXMLDOMNode's "attribute" property, Jim Ancona
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Access the IXMLDOMNode's "attribute" property, Wayne Steele
• [xml-dev] Compatibility for XML attribute types with schemas, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: [xml-dev] Compatibility for XML attribute types with schemas, Christopher R. Maden
• RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, John Evdemon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, David Lyon
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, Jeff Greif
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, David Lyon
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, David Lyon
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML 2.0 Specifications and working groups, David Lyon
• [xml-dev] [ANN] PowerXML data integration platform, Ramin Firoozye
• [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- no way!, Dave Winer
• RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, Dave Winer
  • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, PaulT
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, Dave Winer
    • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Soumitra Sengupta
• RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Champion, Mike
  • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Fredrik Lindgren
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Jonathan Robie
    • [xml-dev] RE: Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Tim Bray
    • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Benjamin Franz
    • Message not available
      • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers --noway!, Champion, Mike
• Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, Dave Winer
• [xml-dev] Another reason patents suck, Dave Winer
  • Re: [xml-dev] Another reason patents suck, John Cowan
    • Re: [xml-dev] Another reason patents suck, Dave Winer
• [xml-dev] Is the SAX NamespaceSupport class broken?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] Is the SAX NamespaceSupport class broken?, David Brownell
    • [xml-dev] Re: [Sax-devel] Is the SAX NamespaceSupport class broken?, David Brownell
• [xml-dev] New SAX site is up!, David Brownell
• [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Don Park
  • Re: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Ann Navarro
    • Re: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Ann Navarro
    • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Don Park
      • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Ann Navarro
      • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Don Park
      • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Ann Navarro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Comment on W3C Patent Policy WG Response, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML Tuple Spaces (was: RE: [xml-dev] Web Service: SOAP or {HTML +Servlets}?), Patrick Thompson
• [xml-dev] [ANN] XInclude implementation for the Microsoft XML Parserusing SAX2 API, xinclude.net
  • Message not available
    • Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] XInclude implementation for the Microsoft XMLParser using SAX2 API, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] XInclude implementation for the Microsoft XMLParser using SAX2 API, xinclude.net
      • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] XInclude implementation for the Microsoft XMLParser using SAX2 API, Daniel Veillard
  • Re: [xml-dev] [ANN] XInclude implementation for the Microsoft XMLParser using SAX2 API, David Brownell
• [xml-dev] XML Data from ASP cached/erroneous, Andrew Spencer
• [xml-dev] new SOAP Encoding spec issue, Jacek Kopecky
  • Re: [xml-dev] new SOAP Encoding spec issue, Jacek Kopecky
• RE: [xml-dev] Cutting special deals for open source developers -- noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Huy-Lan Phan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Wayne Steele
    • Re: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Ronald Bourret
      • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Vance Christiaanse
      • Re: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Eddie Robertsson
      • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Vance Christiaanse
      • Re: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Eddie Robertsson
      • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Priscilla Walmsley
      • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Vance Christiaanse
      • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Priscilla Walmsley
      • Re: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Eddie Robertsson
      • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Vance Christiaanse
      • Re: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Ronald Bourret
  • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Help regarding an XML attribute., Huy-Lan Phan
• [xml-dev] ANN: XML Validator Release 0.14, Rob Lugt
• [xml-dev] Murphy on XML, Nalini Jensen
  • [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Francis Norton
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Christopher R. Maden
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Michael Smith
      • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Leigh Dodds
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Francis Norton
  • [xml-dev] Distributed XML for 2002 !, David Lyon
• [xml-dev] ANN: XSBROWSER v2.0 released, Joerg Rieger
• [xml-dev] XMI tools, Pete Kirkham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XMI tools, Arnold, Curt
• Ideas are free (Was - Re: [xml-dev] Another reason patents suck), Peter R Elliott
• [xml-dev] Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?), Jeff Lowery
  • Re: [xml-dev] Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?), Tom Bradford
    • Re: [xml-dev] Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?), Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?), Ronald Bourret
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?), Manos Batsis
  • RE: [xml-dev] Slow xml-dev day (is everybody working?), Jeff Lowery
• Reinventing wheels (was RE: [xml-dev] Slow xml-dev day (is everyb odyworking?)), Champion, Mike
• [xml-dev] ANN: Pretty XML Tree Viewer, Mike Brown
• [xml-dev] interleave algorithm?, Gary Stephenson
  • Re: [xml-dev] interleave algorithm?, James Clark
  • Re: [xml-dev] interleave algorithm?, Joe English
    • Re: [xml-dev] interleave algorithm?, Gary Stephenson
      • Re: [xml-dev] interleave algorithm?, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
      • Re: [xml-dev] interleave algorithm?, Gary Stephenson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: [xml-dev] interleave algorithm?, Michael Fitzgerald
• [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Jim Ancona
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • RE: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Evan Lenz
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
      • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Francis Norton
      • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, David Carlisle
  • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Francis Norton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Richard Tobin
    • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI using existing infoset items, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] Follow up on: Help regarding an XML attribute., Huy-Lan Phan
  • Re: [xml-dev] Follow up on: Help regarding an XML attribute., Eddie Robertsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Follow up on: Help regarding an XML attribute., Wayne Steele
  • RE: [xml-dev] Follow up on: Help regarding an XML attribute., Huy-Lan Phan
• RE: [xml-dev] RE: Cutting special deals for open source developer s --noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] RE: Cutting special deals for open source developer s --noway!, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: [xml-dev] RE: Cutting special deals for open source developer s --noway!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] I want un-subscribe from this list, Thanks!, Xuelin Zhuang
  • [xml-dev] I want un-subscribe from this list, Thanks!, Andrew Wong Yen
• [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Tim Bray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Dan Mabbutt
    • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Jeff Rafter
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Dave Simmonds
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, PaulT
      • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, JR Ketelsen
      • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, PaulT
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Wayne Steele
    • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, David Lyon
  • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Wayne Steele
    • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, David Lyon
      • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Jim Ancona
      • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Jim Ancona
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Jim Ancona
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] More patent funnies!, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Champion, Mike
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Matthew Gertner
    • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Tom Van den Eynde
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Joshua Allen
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Joshua Allen
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Dave Winer
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Francis Norton
      • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Joshua Allen
    • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Jim Ancona
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Jim Ancona
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Francis Norton
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Lauren Wood
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Alejandro Mezcua
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Anderson, John
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, team refind
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Anderson, John
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Dave Winer
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Fuchs, Matthew
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, team refind
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, David Lyon
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Generating reports for XML-based tables, Jorge Bello
  • Re: [xml-dev] Generating reports for XML-based tables, Ronald Bourret
  • Message not available
    • Re: [xml-dev] Generating reports for XML-based tables, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: [xml-dev] Generating reports for XML-based tables, Ronald Bourret
• [xml-dev] XML pretty printer?, Hanson, Jon
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML pretty printer?, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML pretty printer?, Robert C. Lyons
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML pretty printer?, Jeff Lowery
• [xml-dev] patent worth reading, Simon St.Laurent
• [xml-dev], RAVI KHATAWKAR
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • [xml-dev], S
• [xml-dev] To conver XML to EXCEL, RAVI KHATAWKAR
  • Re: [xml-dev] To conver XML to EXCEL, Betty Harvey
    • Re: [xml-dev] To conver XML to EXCEL, Jim Ancona
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] To conver XML to EXCEL, Sterin, Ilya
  • RE: [xml-dev] To conver XML to EXCEL, Hanson, Jon
• [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Magick, Brian
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Soumitra Sengupta, Ph.D.
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Leigh Dodds
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jeff Greif
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ranjeet Sonone
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Magick, Brian
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Tom Bradford
    • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Leigh Dodds
      • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Leigh Dodds
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • XML Wikipedia (was RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?), Leigh Dodds
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Tom Bradford
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Soumitra Sengupta
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Soumitra Sengupta
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Joe English
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Michael Rys
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
    • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Evan Lenz
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, bob mcwhirter
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ronald Bourret
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Michael Rys
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, XML Everywhere
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, PaulT
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, bob mcwhirter
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jonathan Robie
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Tim Bray
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Soumitra Sengupta
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Nicolas LEHUEN
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Nicolas LEHUEN
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
      • [xml-dev] [ANN] Schematron upgrade using MSXML 4 RTM, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Ronald Bourret
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jeff Lowery
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, David Lyon
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, PaulT
      • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Soumitra Sengupta
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Magick, Brian
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Magick, Brian
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Eric Lemond
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Dan Weinreb
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, PaulT
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, PaulT
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Tom Bradford
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Michael Rys
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?, Eric Lemond
• [xml-dev] [Admin] XML-DEV Posting Guidelines, Leigh Dodds
• [xml-dev] Late-Breaking Sessions finalized for XML Conference 2001,Decembe r 9-14 in Orlando, Elledge, Marion
• [xml-dev] creating XML documents with ASP, asi
• [xml-dev] [ANN] new schema related tools from Sun, Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI
• [xml-dev] SAX2 r2 pre2 release, David Brownell
• [xml-dev] Re: SAX-core #2: factories, David Brownell
• [xml-dev] using alternative stylesheet in an xml, priya
• [xml-dev] OASIS TC Call For Participation: Web Services ComponentModel TC, Karl F. Best
• [xml-dev] problem in using schema for schemas, Takuki Kamiya
  • Re: [xml-dev] problem in using schema for schemas, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] PSVI in the instance, Wayne Steele
  • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI in the instance, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI in the instance, Wayne Steele
    • Re: [xml-dev] PSVI in the instance, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] Perl XML::Parser and nested external entity references, D.J. Miller II
  • Re: [xml-dev] Perl XML::Parser and nested external entity references, David Brownell
  • Re: [xml-dev] Perl XML::Parser and nested external entity references, Ernest G. Allen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Perl XML::Parser and nested external entity references, D.J. Miller II
    • Re: [xml-dev] Perl XML::Parser and nested external entity references, Ernest G. Allen
• RE: XML Wikipedia (was RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?), Champion, Mike
  • RE: XML Wikipedia (was RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?), Leigh Dodds
• [xml-dev] calling java function from xsl throws NullPointerException, Haresh Gujarathi
• [xml-dev] Call for speakers closes Nov. 10 (NextWare Spring 2002), Ken North
  • [xml-dev] Clarification: call for speakers for NextWare Spring 2002, Ken North
• [xml-dev] Looking for XML schema for "human" events, Monica Berko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Looking for XML schema for "human" events, mrossi
  • re[2]: [xml-dev] Looking for XML schema for "human" events, Hal Gottfried
• [xml-dev] jar files question, Rossi, Bernard L. (LNG)
  • RE: [xml-dev] jar files question, Leigh Dodds
• [xml-dev] Browser-based XML Editor?, John.Brooking
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Browser-based XML Editor?, Champion, Mike
• [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: XML Spy 4.1 Suite now available - adds support forXSL:FO (Formatting Objects) and PDF conversion, XML Spy
• [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: Xybrix 0.1 released, Jim Wissner
  • Re: [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: Xybrix 0.1 released, Jean-Marc Vanel
  • Re: [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: Xybrix 0.1 released, Mike Moran
    • Re: [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: Xybrix 0.1 released, Jim Wissner
• RE: [xml-dev] XML Database Decision Tree?[xml-dev-help@lists.xml.org: Not authorized to submit to elist:xml-dev], Dan Weinreb
• [xml-dev] ANN. NXML and Chunks version 1.0, PaulT
• [xml-dev] HELP! I need a straight answer about Xschemas IE6 and msxml4, Chamindu
  • Re: [xml-dev] HELP! I need a straight answer about Xschemas IE6 andmsxml4, Hal F. Gottfried
  • RE: [xml-dev] HELP! I need a straight answer about Xschemas IE6 andmsxml4, Julian Reschke
• [xml-dev] XML test files., jalal
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML test files., Leigh Dodds
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML test files., David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML test files., Howard Katz
• [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Devlin, Kurt
  • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Devlin, Kurt
    • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Jason Diamond
      • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Ernest G. Allen
      • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, David Brownell
    • RE: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Ernest G. Allen
    • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Rob Lugt
      • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Ernest G. Allen
      • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Marcus Carr
      • Re: [xml-dev] Handling internal general entities with SAX, Ernest G. Allen
• Way OT (Was - Re: [xml-dev] XML for Video, Pizza Shops & TakeOut), Peter R Elliott
• [xml-dev] Notation processors, Bent Rasmussen
  • Re: [xml-dev] Notation processors, Al Snell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Notation processors, Nicolas LEHUEN
    • RE: [xml-dev] Notation processors, Al B. Snell
      • Re: [xml-dev] Notation processors, Olivier DUBUISSON
• [xml-dev] XML/XSL & IE & WIN32 Beginner Question, Stout, Joel R
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML/XSL & IE & WIN32 Beginner Question, W. Hugh Chatfield I.S.P.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML/XSL & IE & WIN32 Beginner Question, Wayne Steele
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML/XSL & IE & WIN32 Beginner Question, Stout, Joel R
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML/XSL & IE & WIN32 Beginner Question, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML/XSL & IE & WIN32 Beginner Question, Stout, Joel R
• [xml-dev] How do I unsubscribe to this list?, Kaydell Leavitt
  • RE: [xml-dev] How do I unsubscribe to this list?, Leigh Dodds
• [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Anoop A V
  • Re: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Jeff Greif
  • Message not available
    • Re: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Anoop A V
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Joshua Allen
    • RE: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., J C Theriot
    • RE: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Tim Bray
  • RE: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Joshua Allen
    • Re: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Jeff Greif
    • Re: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Jeff Rafter
    • Re: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Anoop A V
  • RE: [xml-dev] To continue parsing after a fatal error., Michael Brennan
• [xml-dev] embedded XML parser, Eric Chiu
  • Re: [xml-dev] embedded XML parser, David Brownell
  • Re: [xml-dev] embedded XML parser, John Wilson
• [xml-dev] Town Hall at XML 2001 to focus on Patent and Web Standards --, Elledge, Marion
• [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: XQuery Implementation Demo available online fromX-Hive, jvrdam
• [xml-dev] Patent Pools, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Eric van der Vlist
    • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ?, Simon St.Laurent
• [xml-dev] Patent Townhall Meeting and new W3C Patent Issue (was RE:[xml-de v] Patent Pools), Champion, Mike
• [xml-dev] Request for help, Premkumar Sivasankar
• [xml-dev] XHTML and also XML, Suresh Babu Koya
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XHTML and also XML, Suresh Babu Koya
  • FW: [xml-dev] XHTML and also XML, Suresh Babu Koya
    • Re: [xml-dev] XHTML and also XML, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] XHTML and also XML, Suresh Babu Koya
    • Re: [xml-dev] XHTML and also XML, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] XHTML and also XML, Suresh Babu Koya
• RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ? - Maybe it's time togo to XML 2.0, David Lyon
  • RE: [xml-dev] Who can implement W3C XML Schema ? - Maybe it's timetogo to XML 2.0, Leigh Dodds
• [xml-dev] [Announce] Word - XML bi-directional conversion now available, Frank Shell
• [xml-dev] Use of XML in Canadian Federal Government?, Bob Irving
• Re: [xml-dev] ANNOUNCE: XQuery Implementation Demo available onlinefrom X-Hive, Jonathan Robie
• [xml-dev] Dbxml+Cocoon can anyone help me, antonio.ribas
  • Re: [xml-dev] Dbxml+Cocoon can anyone help me, Kimbro Staken
• [xml-dev] New email address, Frank Boumphrey
• [xml-dev] Better DOM with Perl - IBM article, Jeffrey I Condon
• [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, BigBoss
  • Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Tim Bray
      • Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema ,Is there a way ?, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: [Moderator Action] Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema ,Is there a way ?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Daniel Veillard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Michael Brennan
  • RE: [xml-dev] IDs without DTD/Schema , Is there a way ?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Schema training recommendation, GLACE, Jessica
  • Re: [xml-dev] Schema training recommendation, Steve.Ball
• [xml-dev] Problem in XML Schema., abhay_c
  • Re: [xml-dev] Problem in XML Schema., Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] selfishness, Simon St.Laurent
• [xml-dev] The Virtues of Selfishness, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] XML Infoset is a W3C recommendation, Daniel Veillard
• RE:XML repository (was [xml-dev]), Anderson, John
• [xml-dev] root tag, Francisco Belloso
  • Re: [xml-dev] entity encodings (was: root tag), David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] root tag, DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
• [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to "standards compliance", Edd Dumbill
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", sateesh narahari
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Bjoern Hoehrmann
    • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Dan Mabbutt
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Ann Navarro
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Jason Diamond
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Tim Bray
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", David Carlisle
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Benjamin Franz
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Danny Ayers
• RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards com pliance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards com pliance", Paul Brown
• RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Joshua Allen
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Edd Dumbill
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Dave Winer
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Tim Bray
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to, Richard Tobin
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Ken North
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Ken North
  • Message not available
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appeal to"standards compliance", Daniel Veillard
• RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards comp liance", Champion, Mike
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards comp liance", Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards comp liance", Ivan Pedruzzi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards comp liance", Eric Bohlman
    • expectations (was Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards comp liance"), Simon St.Laurent
• [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Tim Bray
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, John Cowan
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, John Cowan
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Tim Bray
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bart Schuller
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Christopher R. Maden
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, John Cowan
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Rob Lugt
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, MURATA Makoto
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Michael Brennan
    • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bjoern Hoehrmann
    • Re: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Michael Brennan
  • RE: [xml-dev] Text/xml with omitted charset parameter, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Managing XML dialects - any good processes?, Ian Graham
  • Re: [xml-dev] Managing XML dialects - any good processes?, Ronald Bourret
    • Re: [xml-dev] Managing XML dialects - any good processes?, Ian Graham
    • Re: [xml-dev] Managing XML dialects - any good processes?, Christopher R. Maden
• RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Joshua Allen
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Dennis Sosnoski
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Dennis Sosnoski
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Steven R. Newcomb
      • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Gary Stephenson
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Dave Winer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Joshua Allen
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Joshua Allen
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Joshua Allen
• [xml-dev] It's all your fault, Edd !, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] XML schema: attribute constraint, KRUMPOLEC Martin
  • Re: [xml-dev] XML schema: attribute constraint, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] XML schema: attribute constraint, Jeff Lowery
• RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards compl iance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards compl iance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards compl iance", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] RE: expectations, Joshua Allen
• [xml-dev] [Q] Xerces and DOM2 getInternalSubset, David Megginson
• RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance", Champion, Mike
  • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical, Richard Tobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance", John.Brooking
    • Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance", Jason Diamond
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance", Michael Brennan
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance", Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance", Nicolas LEHUEN
• [xml-dev] Java: interface methods with same name and signature, Ronald Bourret
• RE: [xml-dev] Java: interface methods with same name and signatur e, Michael Brennan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Java: interface methods with same name and signatur e, Gregory M. Messner
  • RE: [xml-dev] Java: interface methods with same name and signatur e, Fuchs, Matthew
• [xml-dev] ANN: Internet-live XML-related lectures to world-wideaudiences in real-time, G. Ken Holman
• [xml-dev] Call for speakers closes in 14 days for NEXTWARE Spring 2002, Ken North
• [xml-dev] MSN is back, Eric van der Vlist
• [xml-dev] Registration status, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • [xml-dev] Re: Registration status, Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: [xml-dev] Registration status, David Carlisle
    • Re: [xml-dev] Registration status, Ian Graham
    • Re: [xml-dev] Registration status, Mark Baker
      • Re: [xml-dev] Registration status, David Carlisle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Registration status, David Carlisle
  • Re: [xml-dev] Registration status, David Carlisle
• [xml-dev] TransQuery - XSLT as Query Language, Evan Lenz
• [xml-dev] XrML?, DuCharme, Bob (LNG)
  • Re: [xml-dev] XrML?, Rick Jelliffe
• [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Tim Bray
  • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Tom Bradford
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Tom Bradford
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, David Brownell
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Tom Bradford
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Richard Tobin
  • Message not available
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, John Cowan
  • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Marcus Carr
  • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, James Clark
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Tim Bray
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, John Cowan
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, David Brownell
      • permanent keys (was Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML), Nikita Ogievetsky
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Christopher R. Maden
      • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Frank Richards
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Don Park
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bob Hutchison
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bob Hutchison
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Leigh Dodds
      • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Don Park
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Richard Tobin
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, John Cowan
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Rob Lugt
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Richard Tobin
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Marcus Carr
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Joe English
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Marcus Carr
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Daniel Veillard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Fred L. Drake, Jr.
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
    • Message not available
      • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Daniel Veillard
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, John Cowan
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Marcus Carr
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Rob Lugt
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Fuchs, Matthew
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
    • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, David Brownell
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Champion, Mike
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: [xml-dev] Re: determining ID-ness in XML, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [xml-dev] Include another XSL, BillGong
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] Include another XSL, Vadim Permyakov
• [xml-dev] Canonical XML, BigBoss
  • RE: [xml-dev] Canonical XML, Don Park
• [xml-dev] design problem, Birney, Kenneth
  • Re: [xml-dev] design problem, Al Snell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [xml-dev] design problem, Birney, Kenneth
    • Re: [xml-dev] design problem, Pete Kirkham
  • RE: [xml-dev] design problem, Matar, Mohammad A. (LNG)
• [xml-dev] The call for presentations for the XML Europe 2002Conference is now open, Elledge, Marion
• [xml-dev] Simple Beginners Problems, Carlyle Sutphen
• [xml-dev] Understanding the ID, Leigh Dodds
  • Re: [xml-dev] Understanding the ID, John Wilson
• [xml-dev] XML and Halloween, Robin Cover
• [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?, Magick, Brian
  • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?, Marcus Carr
  • RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?, Max Dunn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?, Mike_Leditschke
  • RE: [xml-dev] When to Validate XML?, Champion, Mike
• [xml-dev] XML FAQ in Amharic, EthiO Systems