[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
At 11:17 AM -0500 12/8/01, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>It's funny to me how the Infoset view of XML documents completely blows
>off any notion of "smallest possible change". In my own development,
>I'm moving toward an interface which will support the Infoset
>expectation of unordered, but still preserve the original order.
>
This isn't an infoset issue though. It's part of XML 1.0. Remember,
XML 1.0 does not just define the syntax for a class of items known as
XML documents. It also "describes the required behavior of an XML
processor in terms of how it must read XML data and the information
it must provide to the application." Attribute order is not one of
the things a processor is required to provide, and indeed it is one
we know many processors in fact do not provide. Relying on it is
dangerous and should be discouraged.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|
