[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
> From: Alan Kent [mailto:ajk@mds.rmit.edu.au]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:15 AM
> To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Some comments on the 1.1 draft
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:47:48PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > > The normalization of CR, LF and CRLF can be avoided by using their
> > > character entities. So I still can preserve fidelity.
> >
> > I don't think this is true. For instance, using MSXSL, try:
>
> I don't think using an implementation of XSLT is a valid way to
> say what the XML spec says should be done. Its always dangerous
Correct. But I though it was the easiest way to demonstrate it (Saxon
behaves similarily, I tested that before).
Yet, it seems you are right and my example was wrong. I'm surprised, because
this seems to be a very special case (normally, it doesn't matter *how* you
get a character into your XML).
|
