Re: [xml-dev] Supporting Unicode

[John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>]

Rob Griffin scripsit:

> - the Unicode standard doesn't define a glyph for them

The glyphs in the Unicode book are informative, not normative; you can substitute
any other glyph that doesn't destroy the meaning ("b" would be a losing
glyph for LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A, for example).

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan