[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>,<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: NULL in C (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?)
- From: "Michael Rys" <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 15:02:04 -0800
- Thread-index: AcGJ/I2kPfLyv6jwSEuy0kdqdvoZdwAdeLBw
- Thread-topic: NULL in C (was RE: [xml-dev] Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?)
This is going off-topic a bit, but two ways to represent 0C in C strings
are:
- Do not use *char but operate on the byte level. Since C let's you work
on a string even if it contains 0C (although not with the standard
string libraries, functions and operations), you could return a struct
that gives the length and the memory area.
Thus 'a0Cb0C0Cd' would become (6, 'a0Cb0C0Cd')
- Use an array of strings where every 0C will move to the next item and
give length of array. You will need a sentinel at the end for the last
0C.
Thus 'a0Cb0C0Cd' would become (4, 'a0C', 'b0C', '0C, 'd0C')
So it is doable, but not easy...
Best regards
Michael
|