[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
In article <E16OGJd-0005Ji-00@mercury.ccil.org> John Cowan wrote:
>Certainly crisp, if a tad unclear.
Sigh, that's what you get for not going through the process. Ok, let's
do it properly:
The XML Limerick Working Group has released the first draft of XML
Limerick 1.0.
Abstract
This document defines a canonical XML Limerick.
Status of this document
This document is the first Working Draft version of the XML Limerick
and has been produced by the W3C XML Limerick Working Group as part
of the W3C XML Activity.
We explicitly invite comments on this document. Please send them to
xml-dev@lists.xml.org.
A list of current W3C Recommendations and other technical documents
can be found at http://www.theonion.com. W3C publications may be
updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. In
particular it is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference
material or to cite them as other than work in progress.
1. Line One
There was a young fellow from Ouagadougoo
Issue: Is a byte-order mark required at the start of the limerick?
Issue: Need feedback from Accessibility WG on whether it is acceptable
to restrict limerick to certain age groups and genders.
Issue: What are the scansion requirements? In fact, where is
the requirements document at all?
Issue: Obviously we need an XML syntax; the WG solicits
input on this subject.
Issue[RMT]: Should we be concerned with the surface syntax?
Surely we should be defining the infoset of the limerick.
2. Line two
Who [there is no consensus in the WG as to what the rest of this
line should contain]
3. Line three
He used DOM and SAX,
Issue[ricko]: I am very disappointed with this.
It shows a complete disregard for Unicode 6.3. It is also
ultra vires and fattening.
4. Line four
And even RELAX,
Issue: What is the normative reference for RELAX? Shouldn't it
be RELAX NG anyway?
Issue: Which schema languages are adequate to constrain a limerick
to legal form?
5. Line five
[This section will describe the surprising results of of using XML
Schemas in the bath.]
6. Normative references
7. Informative references
-- Richard
|
