xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] An Architecture for Limericks (was Limericks, Stupidity, a

RE: [xml-dev] An Architecture for Limericks (was Limericks, Stupidity, a

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'John Cowan' <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "Anderson, John" <John@Barbadosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] An Architecture for Limericks (was Limericks, Stupidity, and Reality)
From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@schemantix.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 15:21:45 +0100
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org

> Turnover varies enormously
>  From one organization to another.
>    We hear of companies
>    With a ten percent turnover,
> And others in the same business with a hundred percent or higher.
> 	--De Marco & Lister, _Peopleware_, ch. 16
> 
> Which is actually rather better than I thought it was going to be.

Yeah, it sounds a lot better than many of the limericks posted to this list.
Go figure...

;-)

Matt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] An Architecture for Limericks (was Limericks, Stupi dity, and Reality)
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Limericks, Stupidity, and Reality (was Re:[xml-dev] [ANN] XML Limerick Competition)
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] ANN: Gorille 0.3
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] An Architecture for Limericks (was Limericks, Stupidity, and Reality)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] An Architecture for Limericks (was Limericks, Stupi dity, and Reality)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread