[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Yeah, that was the kind of thing I thought about in this mail :
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200201/msg00836.html
but I didn't wrapped it in RDDL paper, trying to write it in RDF instead.
Regards,
Nicolas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
To: "Doug Ransom" <Doug.Ransom@pwrm.com>; "Xml-Dev@Lists. Xml. Org (E-mail)"
<xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] RDDL resources for validating XML documents
> Doug Ransom wrote:
>
> Has anyone defined an xlink:role and xlink:purpose to find a peice of code
> (say a .NET component) that would validate an XML document? That would
> allow the namespace designer to choose the method to validate the XML
> document (i.e. VB, Schematron, Schema, or a combination).
>
> ----
> There is a 'well known' document describing purposes related to software:
>
> http://www.openhealth.org/RDDL/purposes/software
>
> in which we could define:
>
> http://www.openhealth.org/RDDL/purposes/software#validators
>
> and the nature would label the appropriate code type. Would that do?
>
> ----
> If an instance document were to be validated, the code might be like this:
>
> v=new SomeObject("some-object-uri-defined-by-an-xlink")
> v.Validate(InstanceDocument)
>
>
> ----
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
>
|
