OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: [xml-dev] Is a namespace a set?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

One way to look at this is that it is irrelevant. Except for the
sentence you quote, the namespaces spec talks only about mapping
prefixes to URIs. The result of this mapping is a two-part naming system
for XML names that allows the creation of unique identifiers.

A "namespace" is simply the set of all names that share the same URI.
This is not really relevant to the implementation or use of the naming

For more discussion, see the following, especially myth #1:


-- Ron

Klaus Backert wrote:
> Hi,
> several contributors to this list said, that a namespace is a set.
> In http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114 the first definition
> states:
> [Definition:] An XML namespace is a collection of names ... XML namespaces
> differ from the "namespaces" conventionally used in computing disciplines in
> that the XML version has internal structure and is not, mathematically
> speaking, a set ...
> I would appreciate an explanation very much, because I want to learn more
> about namespaces - and not only to follow the rather confusing RDDL-thread
> ;-) Is a namespace a set or not? Does it depend? Does it matter?


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS