OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   RE: [xml-dev] Strategies for a lowly XML document

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

Precisely.  PIs say very boldly and without 
recourse, "this is system information; don't 
bother with me if you aren't that".  

If we attach semantics to namespace names, 
aren't we reinventing PDF (this name references 
this object in this framework)?


-----Original Message-----
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu]

>PIs are for application-specific processing IMHO.  This is not
>application-specific at all.

I think it is application specific. It just depends on how you define 

The issue is that if we add an attribute then that attribute must be 
declared in valid documents. We can't just go adding this willy-nilly 
to XHTML or SVG or all the other documents we might want to stick it 
in. We can so add a PI.

This strikes me as very analogous to the existing uses of PIs for 
things like robots, cocoon preprocessing, and stylesheets. It is an 
extra piece of meta-info we want to attach to documents outside of 
the document's normal element structure.


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS