xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone

RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: 'Nicolas Lehuen' <nicolas.lehuen@ubicco.com>, 'Jeff Lowery' <jlowery@scenicsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:16:47 -0600
Cc: xml-dev@lists.xml.org

Newcomb's email has the clue.

Again, what is the difference in an arch form and a 
pile 'o attributes on the root?

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicolas Lehuen [mailto:nicolas.lehuen@ubicco.com]

> Why is this debate still being held every year?
> 
> len

New year's resolutions ?

Follow-Ups:
- AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@ubicco.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Strategies for a lowly XML document
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
Next by thread: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS