xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] Ther

Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] Ther

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@rbii.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 22:11:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFIEBFENAA.danny666@virgilio.it>
Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
References: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFIEBFENAA.danny666@virgilio.it>

On Saturday 26 January 2002 08:09 pm, Danny Ayers wrote:
> >I don't think the document is the place to specify the sets of
> >applicable semantics.
>
> By supplying namespaces, aren't you doing exactly that?

One reason why I vehemently dislike them.... they give people a sense 
of false security.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>

References:
- RE: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Generality of HTTP
Next by Date: Web/HTTP History
Previous by thread: RE: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: [xml-dev ] There is a m eaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS