[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Banerjee, Saurabh wrote:
> Thanks John! Actually the question was what is the equivalent of the
> following schema definition in DTD terms?
Ah. DTDs have no equivalent of xs:all at all. You either have
to tighten up the content model and require ordering, or loosen
it and allow multiple fnames and lnames.
My advice, if this is a real problem and not a mere test, would
be to go with commonName, sortName anyhow, because you cannot
be guaranteed to have just two parts to a name, nor which part is
appropriate to sort on:
<personnel>
<commonName>George W. Bush</commonName>
<sortName>Bush, George W.</sortName>
</personnel>
vs.
<personnel>
<commonName>Davíð Oddsson</commonName>
<sortName>Davíð Oddsson</sortName>
</personnel>
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
|