Lists Home |
Date Index |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: 31 January 2002 14:58
> To: 'Lars Marius Garshol'; xml-dev
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
> It may be that AFs are not THE solution, but a solution
> that like so many others (relax, xml schemas, dtds,
> xslt) and so on, once understood and implemented,
> have a niche in which they thrive. If there are
> overlaps in functionality with other specifications,
> so what?
True, but it's useful to find where the overlaps are, and
the environments where each solution is better.
I'll try to summarise the points made in this thread and circulate
it back through the list.