xml-dev - Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a me

Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a me

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "The Deviants" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:24:03 -0800
In-reply-to: <012c01c1a9f8$a7c5b4a0$4bc8a8c0@AlletteSystems.com>
References: <4XOKTPSQ3W1VLJ9607AZVUSBAUOYX05.3c586905@MChamp><093701c1a9f2$71c37820$0a2e249b@nemc.org><3C589A61.95139DF@prescod.net>

At 12:43 PM 31/01/02 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>For XML 2, if it keeps entities

*If* there's ever an XML 2 - and that's a long shot - one of
the #1 requirements would be nuke entities, I think.  -Tim

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is ameaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: Mike Champion <mc@xegesis.org>
- Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
  - From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
Next by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] misprocessing namespaces (was Re: [xml-dev] There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread