[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Subject: Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
- From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:58:25 +1100
- References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131083303.02814c60@pop.intergate.ca> <m37kpym99c.fsf@dmitri.coolheads.com> <3C59B86C.DC7C9084@prescod.net> <E16WPTh-0001zW-00@server2000.ebizhostingsolutions.com>
From: "Gavin Thomas Nicol" <gtn@rbii.com>
> > The whole XML world is organized around the idea that the GI is the
> > *type name*.
>
> The name is not the same as the thing. I think the whole idea that gi
> == type to be one of the biggest peices of misinformation around.
I think the problem is not so much people thinking that Generic Identifier == type
but more that Generic Identifier = table name!
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
|
