Lists Home |
Date Index |
On Friday 01 February 2002 02:08 pm, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> I think XPointer is useful, but it should not own the fragment
> identifier. That should be reserved for something *much* simpler.
Perhaps that is the *real* issue? We keep hearing about complexity,
but implementation experience says that XPointer is only incrementally
worse than XPath (which for many things is way overkill).
FWIW. I think that it's fine for XPointer to own the fragment
identifier of text/xml.... just not for things like SVG.
Ultimately, fragment identifiers are a hack anyway.