[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
Michael Brennan wrote:
> This would mean extending the use of labels beyond simply labeling
> resources and locators within an extended link, but this seems to me to
> be a very logical extension. I don't see why we need IDs for this versus
> a simple label explicitly for the purpose of linking.
Because IDs are fairly widespread in documents, being used for
many purposes, but xlink:label attributes are not. That makes it
annoying to link to existing (unchangeable) documents.
--
John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
|
