xml-dev - RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms

RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

To: "'Steven R. Newcomb'" <srn@coolheads.com>,"'Lars Marius Garshol'" <larsga@garshol.priv.no>
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:11:02 -0000
Cc: "'xml-dev'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <m33d0fflmp.fsf@dmitri.coolheads.com>
Reply-to: <michael.h.kay@ntlworld.com>

> > | To this day, nobody has explained what's so unattractive about the
> > | AF paradigm, or the precise nature of the esthetics that found the
> > | AF solution "ugly".

I've always said that the main barrier to adoption of "architectural forms"
has been the ludicrously inappropriate name for the concept. Names matter.

Michael Kay
Software AG
home: Michael.H.Kay@ntlworld.com
work: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com

References:
- Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
  - From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@coolheads.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [xml-dev] Namespace terminology
Next by Date: Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
Previous by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
Next by thread: Re: [xml-dev] Co-operating with Architectural Forms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread