Lists Home |
Date Index |
Arggh!! I left off the footnotes from my message.
> From: Michael Brennan
> Oh really? So when I send a PDF document over HTTP, does that
> mean PDF is just an extension of HTTP? Some of the arguments
> that get advanced, here, really baffle me. Just look at
> SAML, or DSML. These provide SOAP bindings of their
> structures, but also allow bindings to other "protocols"
> (and, yes, dammit! I am using the word "protocol", here). How
> would you argue, then, that SAML or DSML are just SOAP extensions?
These were meant to reference: